-- dump date   	20140619_121508
-- class       	Genbank::Contig
-- table       	contig_comment
-- id	comment
NC_009648.1	PROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to finalPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000647.PROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000647. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluatedPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000647. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the programPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000647. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3); tRNA genes were determined usingPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000647. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3); tRNA genes were determined using tRNAscan-SE-1.23; This sequence was finished as follows unlessPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000647. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3); tRNA genes were determined using tRNAscan-SE-1.23; This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced  withPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000647. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3); tRNA genes were determined using tRNAscan-SE-1.23; This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced  with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality data (i.e.,PROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000647. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3); tRNA genes were determined using tRNAscan-SE-1.23; This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced  with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality data (i.e., phred quality >=30); an attempt was made to resolve all sequencingPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000647. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3); tRNA genes were determined using tRNAscan-SE-1.23; This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced  with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality data (i.e., phred quality >=30); an attempt was made to resolve all sequencing problems, such as compressions and repeats; all regions werePROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000647. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3); tRNA genes were determined using tRNAscan-SE-1.23; This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced  with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality data (i.e., phred quality >=30); an attempt was made to resolve all sequencing problems, such as compressions and repeats; all regions were covered by sequence from more than one m13 subclone.PROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000647. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3); tRNA genes were determined using tRNAscan-SE-1.23; This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced  with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality data (i.e., phred quality >=30); an attempt was made to resolve all sequencing problems, such as compressions and repeats; all regions were covered by sequence from more than one m13 subclone. COMPLETENESS: full length.
NC_009649.1	PROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to finalPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000648.PROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000648. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluatedPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000648. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the programPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000648. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as followsPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000648. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequencedPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000648. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality dataPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000648. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality data (i.e., phred quality >=30);an attempt was made to resolve allPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000648. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality data (i.e., phred quality >=30);an attempt was made to resolve all sequencing problems, such as compressions and repeats; all regionsPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000648. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality data (i.e., phred quality >=30);an attempt was made to resolve all sequencing problems, such as compressions and repeats; all regions were covered by sequence from more than one m13 subclone.PROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000648. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality data (i.e., phred quality >=30);an attempt was made to resolve all sequencing problems, such as compressions and repeats; all regions were covered by sequence from more than one m13 subclone. COMPLETENESS: full length.
NC_009650.1	PROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to finalPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000649.PROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000649. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluatedPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000649. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the programPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000649. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as followsPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000649. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequencedPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000649. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality dataPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000649. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality data (i.e., phred quality >=30);an attempt was made to resolve allPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000649. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality data (i.e., phred quality >=30);an attempt was made to resolve all sequencing problems, such as compressions and repeats; all regionsPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000649. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality data (i.e., phred quality >=30);an attempt was made to resolve all sequencing problems, such as compressions and repeats; all regions were covered by sequence from more than one m13 subclone.PROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000649. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality data (i.e., phred quality >=30);an attempt was made to resolve all sequencing problems, such as compressions and repeats; all regions were covered by sequence from more than one m13 subclone. COMPLETENESS: full length.
NC_009651.1	PROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to finalPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000650.PROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000650. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluatedPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000650. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the programPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000650. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as followsPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000650. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequencedPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000650. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality dataPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000650. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality data (i.e., phred quality >=30);an attempt was made to resolve allPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000650. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality data (i.e., phred quality >=30);an attempt was made to resolve all sequencing problems, such as compressions and repeats; all regionsPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000650. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality data (i.e., phred quality >=30);an attempt was made to resolve all sequencing problems, such as compressions and repeats; all regions were covered by sequence from more than one m13 subclone.PROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000650. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality data (i.e., phred quality >=30);an attempt was made to resolve all sequencing problems, such as compressions and repeats; all regions were covered by sequence from more than one m13 subclone. COMPLETENESS: full length.
NC_009652.1	PROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to finalPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000651.PROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000651. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluatedPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000651. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the programPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000651. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as followsPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000651. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequencedPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000651. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality dataPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000651. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality data (i.e., phred quality >=30);an attempt was made to resolve allPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000651. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality data (i.e., phred quality >=30);an attempt was made to resolve all sequencing problems, such as compressions and repeats; all regionsPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000651. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality data (i.e., phred quality >=30);an attempt was made to resolve all sequencing problems, such as compressions and repeats; all regions were covered by sequence from more than one m13 subclone.PROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000651. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality data (i.e., phred quality >=30);an attempt was made to resolve all sequencing problems, such as compressions and repeats; all regions were covered by sequence from more than one m13 subclone. COMPLETENESS: full length.
NC_009653.1	PROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to finalPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000652.PROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000652. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluatedPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000652. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the programPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000652. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as followsPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000652. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequencedPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000652. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality dataPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000652. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality data (i.e., phred quality >=30);an attempt was made to resolve allPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000652. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality data (i.e., phred quality >=30);an attempt was made to resolve all sequencing problems, such as compressions and repeats; all regionsPROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000652. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality data (i.e., phred quality >=30);an attempt was made to resolve all sequencing problems, such as compressions and repeats; all regions were covered by sequence from more than one m13 subclone.PROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence was derived from CP000652. Coding sequences below are predicted from manually evaluated computer analysis, using similarity information and the program GeneMark (version 2.3). This sequence was finished as follows unless otherwise noted: all regions were double stranded, sequenced with an alternate chemistries or covered by high quality data (i.e., phred quality >=30);an attempt was made to resolve all sequencing problems, such as compressions and repeats; all regions were covered by sequence from more than one m13 subclone. COMPLETENESS: full length.